top of page
CRITERIA 6: GOVERNANCE, LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT
SSR.webp

6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership

6.1.1 

​

6.1.2 

The institution has a clearly stated vision and mission which are reflected in its academic and administrative governance. 

The effective leadership is reflected in various institutional practices such as decentralization and participative management. 

SSR.webp
SSR.webp

6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment

6.2.1 

6.2.2

 

6.2.3

 

The institutional Strategic plan is effectively deployed.

The functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment, service rules and procedures, etc.

Institution Implements e-governance covering following areas of operation : 
1. Administration;   2. Finance and Accounts;   3. Student Admission and Support;   4.Examination.

​

6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies

6.3.1 

 

 

 

6.3.2

 

6.3.3

 

6.3.4

​

The institution has a performance appraisal system, promotional avenues and effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff.

Average percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences / workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years

Average number of professional development / administrative training programs organized by the University for teaching and non teaching staff during the last five years

Average percentage of teachers undergoing online/ face-to-face Faculty Development Programmes (FDP)during the last five years Professional Development Programmes, Orientation / Induction Programmes, Refresher Course, Short Term Course).

Certificates of teachers attending professional development Programmes

Report 2016 :

Report 2017 :

Report 2018-19 :

Report 2019-20 :

Report 20-21 :

SSR.webp

6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization

6.4.1 

6.4.2

​

6.4.3

​

6.4.4

SSR.webp

6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System

6.5.1 

 

 

6.5.2

​

 

 

 

 

 

6.5.3

Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes by constantly reviewing the teaching learning process, structures &    methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals. 

Institution has adopted the following for Quality assurance 
1. Academic Administrative Audit (AAA) and follow up action taken 
2. Conferences, Seminars, Workshops on quality conducted 
3. Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s) 
4. Orientation programme on quality issues for teachers and students 
5. Participation in NIRF 
6. Any other quality audit recognized by state, national or international agencies (ISO Certification, NBA). 

Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with regard to quality (in case of first cycle), Post accreditation quality initiatives (second and subsequent cycles). 

​

​

bottom of page